In my last article, I introduced The AAR Growth Curiosity Model and explored four areas where curiosity consistently uncovers opportunity: Strategic, Commercial, Stakeholder and Organisational. Loving all the feedback and questions – brilliant.
And I’ve also had a bit of push back. One question in particular keeps coming up – If all four matter, how can any one person possibly cover them all? And of course the answer is – they can’t.
No individual, however experienced, has enough time, access, expertise or exposure to keep a pulse on everything. No strategist can understand every stakeholder dynamic. No account lead can spot every category shift. No client can see every agency conversation. No agency can see every client conversation.
Which made me wonder whether it’s time to start talking about curious teams. Because whilst one curious person can create value, collective curiosity has the potential to create something much more powerful.
A multiplier effect. More than the sum of its parts
Over the years I’ve assessed hundreds of client-agency relationships, and one thing continually stands out. The strongest relationships rarely succeed because one person has all the answers. More often they succeed because lots of people are noticing different things and, crucially, sharing them.
For example, someone in strategy spots a shift in customer behaviour. The client picks up a growing internal concern. The account team recognises stakeholder tension. The data team sees an emerging pattern. A commercial lead notices a change in conversion.
Individually they’re observations. Collectively they become insight. Individually they’re dots. Collectively they become direction. And that’s often where growth begins. Not in the dots themselves, but in the connections between them. As my study wall keeps reminding me – “you can’t connect the dots unless you collect the dots”.
The problem isn’t always curiosity, it’s capacity
One of the biggest challenges facing both agencies and clients today is time. Teams are leaner. Stakeholder groups are bigger. The ask is more complex. Everyone is carrying more.
The answer isn’t expecting one person to become infinitely more curious. It’s making better use of the curiosity capacity already sitting within the team.
Because when curiosity is shared across a group, questions get answered faster. Opportunities surface sooner. Risks become visible earlier. Useful connections get made before they become urgent. Not because people are working harder. Because more people are helping to collect the dots.
The power of collective intent
In my previous article, I talked about curiosity with intent. Being deliberate about where we direct our attention rather than simply asking more questions. I think the same principle applies here.
We’ve all seen agency credentials claiming “we’re curious”. And I don’t doubt they mean it. But curiosity becomes far more powerful when it moves beyond individual behaviour and becomes part of how a team operates.
Imagine if everyone was clear about the lens they brought to the relationship, the dots they were responsible for collecting and the value of sharing what they noticed.
Imagine the advantage that creates. Not random curiosity. Not curiosity for curiosity’s sake. Collective curiosity with purpose. Everyone is focused on something slightly different. But everyone is moving in the same direction. That’s when curiosity becomes magnified.
Beyond T-shaped individuals
For years we’ve talked about T-shaped people. Individuals with depth in one area and curiosity across others. I’ve also written previously about M-shaped people; people who develop multiple areas of expertise whilst remaining connected to the bigger picture.
But increasingly, I find myself wondering whether the bigger opportunity isn’t the shape of individuals at all. Perhaps it’s the shape of teams. The strongest teams I’ve seen don’t rely on one brilliantly curious strategist, consultant, planner or client lead. They create an environment where curiosity sits everywhere.
Different disciplines, levels and experiences bring different perspectives. That’s not duplication. That’s diversity of thought in action. And it dramatically increases the chances of spotting something others may miss. The ambition isn’t a team full of identical curious people. It’s a team full of different curious people.
Collecting dots is one thing. Connecting them is another
Of course, collective curiosity only works if people have opportunities to connect what they’re seeing. And I think this is where many organisations face a challenge. Whether we work remotely, in person or somewhere in between, simply being together isn’t enough. Being in the office isn’t the goal. Being on Teams isn’t the goal.
The goal is creating enough moments for observations, perspectives and ideas to collide. After all, dots don’t connect themselves. Someone needs to say:
“That’s interesting.”
“I’ve seen something similar.”
“I wonder if those two things are connected?”
I sometimes wonder whether we’ve become very good at updating one another and less good at exploring with one another.
We come together to share progress and review actions. But do we come together often enough to spot patterns, challenge assumptions and connect dots? That’s a very modern workplace challenge.
The strongest teams I know are intentional about creating that space. They recognise that sharing observations isn’t a distraction from the work. It is THE WORK.
Why clients feel it
Interestingly, clients often feel the impact of collective curiosity long before they have language for it. They describe agencies as useful. Relevant. Commercial. Connected. Forward-thinking. More often than not they use the phase “they help me see round corners”.
When I really listen to what they’re describing, it often comes back to collective curiosity. They’re experiencing a team whose curiosity extends beyond its own day to day and the immediate brief. A team that is looking, sharing, building and connecting rather than sitting in its own lane. That’s enormously valuable.
Because ultimately clients don’t need ten different observations. They need one clear recommendation informed by ten different observations. The power sits in the collective. The value sits in the synthesis.
The real magic
Perhaps one of the biggest mistakes we make is assuming curiosity belongs solely to individuals. Of course curious individuals matter. The more curious people we have in our teams, businesses and lives, the better.
But the real magic seems to happen when that curiosity becomes collective. When people at every level, in every discipline and on both sides of the relationship are actively collecting dots, sharing them and helping connect them.
One curious person can create value. Collective curiosity multiplies it. A curious client and agency, working together, can create something even more powerful. Because the real opportunity isn’t simply collecting more dots. It’s spotting things earlier. Making connections faster. Seeing around corners sooner. And ultimately helping one another make better decisions. Together.
And that raises another wonderfully pesky question
If curiosity can be amplified, multiplied and shared, can it also be developed? Is it a trait or a skill? That’s where I’ll go next. After all, imagine what becomes possible when curiosity stops sitting with a few people and starts being practised by everybody.